China budget committee makes recommendations on ‘25-’26 budget

by Mary Grow

Five of China’s seven budget committee members met March 17 to make their recommendations on the select board’s draft 2025-26 budget.

They recommended cuts affecting several accounts, and two increases.

The major change budget committee members want is in town employees’ salaries. Select board members, at their March 10 meeting, accepted Town Manager Rebecca Hapgood’s proposed 3.5 percent cost of living increase (see the March 13 issue of The Town Line, p. 3).

Budget committee members recommended a 2.5 percent pay increase for next year. Michael Sullivan proposed a reduction, saying that with the 3.5 percent increase, employees would have gained 20 percent over four years, double the rate of increase in the previous four years.

Kevin Maroon took up the argument, asking the source of the 3.5 percent cost of living increase, on which the recommended pay was based.

The vote to recommend the lower raises was unanimous.

This change affected all accounts that include employee salaries and benefits. Hapgood proposed the budget committee not act on the draft warrant for the June 10 annual town business meeting until she has time to calculate revised figures.

Select board members will decide at their March 24 meeting whether to accept the budget committee’s recommendations. Voters make the final spending decisions at the town meeting.

Budget committee members also recommended deleting a proposed $500 donation to Northern Light Home Care and Hospice, because with Inland Hospital closing in June, no one knew whether the hospice would continue.

Sullivan’s motion to eliminate funding for China’s broadband committee was defeated, supported by himself and Maroon and opposed by Chairman Brent Chesley, Tim Basham and Taryn Hotham. Sullivan also proposed cutting the 2025-26 recreation committee budget, but did not persist after Chesley pointed out it is already $10,900, or about 25 percent, lower than this year.

One increase the budget committee recommended was in the PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) line in the transfer station account. This money funds state-required PFAS remediation. Hapgood said she had just learned one system needs a new pump, expected to cost about $950.

Budget committee members unanimously recommended an additional $1,000, for a total of $6,400.

Maroon proposed the second recommended addition, to the social services account. He moved to put back the $500 donation to the American Red Cross that the select board deleted, at Thomas Rumpf’s request, on March 10.

Maroon, who is a China Village volunteer fire department member, praised the Red Cross for their prompt help to disaster victims, for example when a family’s home burns. He listed other services, including blood drives and safety and life-saving courses.

Basham and Hotham voted with him to reinstate the $500; Chesley and Sullivan were opposed. Chesley later voted against the entire account, because he thinks residents should make their individual choices of organizations and agencies to support.

Chesley, a former select board member, addressed two recommendations to current board members (three of whom were in the March 17 audience). He advised them to investigate health insurance options to seek a less expensive plan for employees; and he recommended paying employees for unused vacation time at the end of each fiscal year, so funding liability would not accumulate.

After select board members review the budget committee recommendations, the latter group needs to meet again to review the town meeting warrant. That meeting is tentatively scheduled for 6 p.m. Wednesday, April 2.

The draft warrant Hapgood prepared for the budget committee meeting did not include the China Village volunteer fire department’s request for a new fire truck. Maroon urged adding the article, summarizing the need to replace an old, unreliable vehicle with an efficient new one.

He reminded those present that the department first asked for funds two years ago, when the truck would have cost substantially less than it will now.