COMMUNITY COMMENTARY: A swift and thoughtful decision

/0 Comments/in , /by

A Step Forward for Fairness and Growth in China

by Tory Stark
China

In a swift and thoughtful decision, the Town of China’s Select Board voted to sign a quitclaim deed resolving a decades-old land title issue involving The Landing. This action formally concludes a 30-year saga tied to the old Route 202 right-of-way — a long-standing confusion that had cast uncertainty over local land records and stalled potential investment.

With this matter now resolved, the Town has not only corrected the public record but also sent a clear message: that local leaders are willing to take meaningful, timely action to support small businesses, strengthen property rights, and foster responsible growth. This decision allows The Landing to move forward with critical infrastructure improvements and future planning that will benefit our fellow residents and visitors.

We are grateful to the Town’s leadership for recognizing the importance of resolving this issue quickly and transparently. Their decision supports continued reinvestment in our community and reinforces the principle that good governance and local business can work hand in hand to create a stronger future for China.

I’m especially grateful to the Select Board members who spoke with me directly, helping me better understand the Town’s perspective and the steps needed to reach this resolution. Their willingness to engage in open, respectful dialogue made all the difference.”

(See also: COMMUNITY COMMENTARY: A matter of fairness and responsibility)

COMMUNITY COMMENTARY: What we need is a third party

/0 Comments/in , /by
by Sheldon Goodine
China resident

We see the debt clock ticking away on TV and getting higher every day. We are told the interest on this debt is the largest expense in the U.S. government, and if allowed to continue the U.S. government could go into default and we could lose our country. This brings up a lot of questions, who do we owe this debt to? What is the interest rate and is there a plan to repay this debt? To me, the answer is simple. Stop spending, overspending. Stop spending more than we take in!

Just about everyone agrees the swamp in Washington needs to be drained, and spending brought under control. We agree there is a lot of waste, fraud and abuse in the federal budget, but no one can agree on how to fix it and stop this financial bleeding.

The two-party system of government in our country is not working. The problem is too many Republicans, too many Democrats and not enough Americans in Washington. When the Democrats get a couple more seats, they control the government without input from Republicans, and vice versa. The score is Democrats 100 percent and Republicans zero percent; Republicans 100 percent and Democrats zero percent; in both scenarios the American people’s score is zero percent.

It’s time to bring a third party into the mix. A party that will work for and vote for the good of America and Americans. It will be the “American Party”. Then we can reduce the number of red states, reduce the number of blue states and greatly increase the number of red, white and blue states.

Put an end forever to party-only politics, get our spending under control, reduce the size of government, stop sending our dollars all over the world, especially to countries whose motto is “Kill Americans”.

One last thought, term limits. Both parties will not vote to limit terms of their members. So, we must do it for them in the form of the ballot. Stop voting for and sending the career politicians back to Washington every election period. It’s time to start over again and get this new “American Party” up and running with the people in charge of working for the good of all Americans. A government of the people, for the people, by the people.

COMMUNITY COMMENTARY: A matter of fairness and responsibility

/0 Comments/in , , /by
by Tory Stark

Take a moment to visit the Town of China’s interactive tax map and search for Tax Map 63, Lot 078, located at the head of the lake. You’ll find something surprising: a parcel of land with no listed owner. This isn’t a glitch — it’s the result of a long-standing error. For decades, this land was mistakenly claimed by the town, despite being used, maintained, and taxed as part of The Landing LLC’s property. The town has since received a legal memorandum affirming it does not own this land — yet it has refused to take the simple, corrective step of updating the public record.

Instead, Town leadership is effectively requiring The Landing LLC to initiate a court case in Superior Court — a process that would come at significant cost to us, and an unknown legal expense to the Town and its taxpayers. This is despite the fact that ownership is no longer in question. According to legal professionals I’ve consulted, this issue has already resulted in approximately $20,000 in title research and legal fees. The matter is resolved — with no legitimate dispute remaining.

This isn’t a bureaucratic oversight — it’s a political decision. Rather than submit a $22 municipal quitclaim deed to the Registry of Deeds to reflect what is already legally established, the town continues to delay. Meanwhile, taxes are not being collected on the parcel in question. To offset this, the Town has incrementally increased the tax burden on the adjacent parcel owned by The Landing. Even then, the full value hasn’t been recovered — leaving the remainder quietly absorbed by every other property owner in China.

Over the past five years, The Landing has made significant investments to help build a better restaurant that showcases our lake, supports local jobs, and contributes to a stronger community. In just the past three years, we’ve invested over $200,000 in electrical upgrades, lighting, IT infrastructure, dock and driveway improvements, picnic tables, equipment, and operational enhancements — all to improve The Landing and better serve the town. We’re proud to contribute — but we cannot continue to grow while operating under the cloud of a title dispute. Banks will not finance a deed clouded by controversy, and this unresolved issue now stands in the way of further investment and development.

If you believe the town should take responsibility and formally correct this error, please contact town leadership and respectfully share your concern. A single phone call could help ensure that our local government acts with fairness, transparency, and accountability.

Town Manager: Becky Hapgood – (207) 445-2014
Selectman: Edwin Bailey – (207) 692-6930
Selectwoman: Jeanne Marquis – (207) 649-3836
Selectman: Blane Casey – (207) 631-2412
Selectman: Wayne Chadwick – (207) 445-3500
Selectman: Thomas Rumpf – (207) 314-1644

Community Commentary is a forum The Town Line makes available for citizens to express their opinions and/or concerns on subjects of interest to our readers, and is not necessarily the views of the staff or the board of directors. The Town Line welcomes, and encourages, supportive comments, differing opinions, counterpoints or opposing views. Keep the rebuttals positive, and informative. Submissions containing personal attacks will be rejected.

COMMUNITY COMMENTARY: Igniting the spark through volunteering

/0 Comments/in , /by
by John Kleindienst
DAV National Voluntary
Services Director

My personal journey into volunteering began in 2013 when I flew home to Texas to be by my grandpa’s side before he died.

Grandpa was a U.S. Army veteran of the Korean and Vietnam wars and was forever changed by service. His kidneys and liver were shutting down because of the effects of toxic exposure. He knew his time was short, and wanted to spend his remaining time at home, not in a hospital.

We set him up with home hospice care. He died peacefully not long after. It was then, sitting by his side, that I realized how meaningful it is to be with people during their final moments. After he passed, I began volunteering in a hospice facility to sit with veterans who faced dying alone.

That sparked my passion to find more ways to help veterans in my personal life. I didn’t have to look far. In my hometown, I found motorized scooter batteries in need of changing, dangerous tree limbs to cut, and overgrown lawns to trim before residents faced eviction. Although these were simple tasks, they meant the world to the veterans who couldn’t do these things on their own.

Realizing that just an hour of my time really could make a difference in a veteran’s life, and feeling good about giving back, I knew I wanted to give that gift to others. Luckily, I can do that in my role as the national voluntary services director for DAV (Disabled American Veterans). DAV is a nonprofit that provides a lifetime of support to veterans of all generations and their families at no-cost.

DAV Community Impact Day is that opportunity to give back. On Saturday, April 5, we invite folks to give an hour of their time helping a veteran in the local community. Folks can pledge their time at communityimpactday.org.

April is National Volunteer Month, so for folks who are not able to participate on April 5, can still make the pledge and give back at a different time. On the website, interested volunteers can also find resources and ideas on how to volunteer for veterans in their community and how to get connected with local DAV Chapter events.

As I’ve learned, giving back doesn’t have to be complicated or time-consuming. It could include mowing a lawn, driving a veteran to a medical appointment, going grocery shopping or writing letters thanking veterans for their service.

At DAV, we know the most valuable gift you can give someone is your time. Regardless of how a person decides to give back, research shows – and I learned firsthand – that the physical and mental benefits are as valuable for the volunteer as they are for the recipient.

And who knows, perhaps this will be your spark to do even more, like my Grandpa was for me.

John Kleindienst is the national director of voluntary services for DAV and an active volunteer. Kleindienst is a U.S. Marine Corps veteran who served from 1996 until he was medically discharged in 2003 as a result of service-connected injuries. That same year, he joined DAV’s professional staff and was appointed to his current position at National Headquarters in 2014. Learn more about DAV’s resources for veterans at dav.org.

COMMUNITY COMMENTARY: Tariffs to dramatically increase energy burden on Maine families

/0 Comments/in , , /by
by Lucy Hochschartner
Maine Conservation Voters’ Climate and Clean Energy Director

In the early hours of the morning, President Trump enacted 25 percent tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico, with 10 percent tariffs on Canadian energy imports. These tariffs are poised to have a devastating effect on Maine families who are already struggling to keep up with rising energy costs. Half of Maine families rely on oil for heating, and 80 percent of Maine’s heating fuel and gasoline is imported from Canada. Regionally, the New England grid operator anticipates $66 million in import duties to import Canadian electricity that will have to be passed on to customers. These tariffs will affect all energy costs, from heating to electricity to gasoline at the pump.

President Trump’s tariffs are going to hurt us. Whether it is you who is impacted, your family, your neighbors, or your friends – these tariffs will increase energy costs dramatically at a time when we must do the opposite. It is time for all of us to take care of each other, regardless of whether we voted for the same person or share the same views. The only way forward is to lean on each other, and into the future of a clean, Maine-made energy system.”

In the long term, Maine can look to Maine-made renewables like onshore wind, offshore wind, and solar to avoid this kind of dependency on volatile global fossil fuel markets. In the meantime, customers should look to local Community Action Agencies, their town’s general assistance program, or their utility company for help if they are struggling to pay. Mainers can get connected to local assistance programs now by calling 2-1-1.

COMMUNITY COMMENTARY: Open meeting vs. secret ballot

/0 Comments/in , , /by
by Sheldon Goodine
China resident

There’s a lot of talk around town about having a traditional town meeting with a moderator, with a required quorum in attendance to conduct business, or a day-long secret ballot meeting. Each has its pros and cons. Since I have been a resident of China for more than 60 years, during which the town has grown from less than 2,000 residents to more than 4,000, my perspective may or may not muddy the waters.

In those early years, town meetings were important social events where community business was conducted. Folks looked forward to getting together each spring at the end of a long winter. They could “catch up” with old friends as well as greet new neighbors. They discussed and decided warrant articles until lunch time, then recessed and enjoyed sharing a great lunch prepared by the ladies. After the meal, they completed the warrant articles to end the day. The meeting closed in peace and harmony, and everyone left happy.

At this time, town business was managed by a select board, which met at the home of town clerk Mary Washburn. As the town grew, the brick portion of the town office was built and the select board increased from three to five members. Soon thereafter, a town manager was hired, and the annual town meeting gradually became less important. Fewer voters turned out to conduct the community’s business, and many became upset that only a few people were making the decisions. even though these same people didn’t take the time to participate.

Although I was not in agreement to legislating participation, an article was approved that required 10 percent of town voters (quorum) to be in attendance to both open and conduct the annual meeting. For many years the town met in the multi-purpose room at the China Middle School. When the current RSU (Regional School Union) was created this venue was no longer used since many felt that it was too much of a disruption for the children.

As a result the current secret ballot form of conducting town business was instituted, resulting in many more residents voting on both the warrant articles and the election of town officers. I have been a regular annual participant in each of these legislative methods. During much of this time, it was difficult to stay informed of the ever increasing number of expense of managing town affairs. Fortunately, with new technology this information is now available to all in a variety of ways. Select board meetings are televised, with an opportunity for the public to participate. These are also recorded for anyone to access after the fact. The Town Line newspaper is printed and distributed weekly with excellent articles of each business meeting, prepared by Mary Grow, which are both accurate and comprehensive. The town manager has created a monthly newsletter with other details of town activities.

My question is how many voters are in favor of each of these most recent forms of conducting town business:

a) Return to the in-person annual town meeting, requiring a minimum number of voters in attendance and, possibly, the construction of a building large enough to accommodate the growing number of participants; or
b) Continue with the current system of voting by secret ballot during the day at the town office.

I hope this is useful and, at the very least, encourage more discussion on this topic and a form of government that will best meet the needs of our ever growing and changing community.

With my thanks to all.

OPINIONS: Open letter to Vassalboro residents

/0 Comments/in , , /by

COMMUNITY COMMENTARY

by Christopher French
Selectboard member Town of Vassalboro

To the respective Voters of the Town of Vassalboro:

In addition to the Presidential election this upcoming November the [Vassalboro] selectboard has presented three referendum questions for your consideration and support. The purpose of my letter focuses on the two questions seeking permission to allocate funds towards a bridge repair.

In the Fall of 2023 engineers connected with the State of Maine alerted the town of the most recent inspection report of the “Dunlap” bridge located on Mill Hill. This culvert-style bridge traverses Seven-mile Brook connecting Webber Pond to the Kennebec River. The report stated, “The culverts are deteriorating at an accelerated rate, and they have dropped from fair condition to serious condition in just a couple of years.” The engineers strongly recommended that the town take action to replace the bridge. Additionally, the engineers advised the town that it may be necessary to “post” the bridge or restrict the maximum weight to as low as “3-tons”. Due to the minimum amount of traffic on this bridge it does not qualify as a state responsibility and replacement falls squarely on the shoulders of the Town.

In the wake of the report the town has taken the following steps.

• Established a committee of local citizens to assess our options.
• Opened communication with our partners at the state level.
• Allo­­cated American Rescue Plan Act funds and hired an engineer to present bridge replacement options.
• Option #1: $1.8 million full span bridge, designed to last 75 years.
• Option #2: Dirigo Timberland design estimated cost $700,000.
• Option #3: Replace the bridge with the existing twin culvert style estimated cost $500,000 and expected to last 30 years.
• The selectboard and budget committee recommended establishing a capital expense fund budgeting $40,000. This request was approved at the annual town vote in June.
• Secured a $200,000.00 grant. This grant may only be used if the town chooses to construct either option #1 or option #2.
• Applied for additional grants, including Federal based.
• Public works removed debris and cut back any jagged or distorted portions of the culverts
• The town has negotiated a contract in the amount of $58,000 with a local engineer pending voter approval.

In June/July 2024 our state partners identified Seven-mile Brook as a crucial spawning ground for migratory fish, to include Salmon and Alewives, catapulting our grant request to the top of consideration. A qualifying factor requires the town to have access to the matching $360,000 in funds which cannot be spent until Vassalboro accepts and signs the grant paperwork.

Referendum #1 authorizes the selectboard to spend up to $360,000 from funds already collected through taxation.

Referendum #2 makes a minor change to the 2014 TIF ordinance that allows for the selectboard to divert existing TIF dollars (currently in the ballpark of $170,000) to environmental projects.

Supporting the selectboard recommendations will provide the town with the necessary financial support to move forward with bridge replacement without negatively impacting the property taxes.

The voters can expect the following distribution of town funds

• $115,000 in accrued interest from our surplus account,
• $170,000 from the TIF account
• $40,000 from the bridge capital expense account
• $200,000 in allotted grant funding.

The total amount of $525,000 will satisfy the required grant match and allow the selectboard to hire the engineer to begin necessary groundwork ahead of construction. If we are not successful in receiving the grant we will be in a healthy position to move forward with option #2.

It is important that the town assumes a proactive position with the replacement of the DUNLAP bridge. I hope you will support the selectboard’s recommendation of voting yes. I would encourage anyone who has questions or requires further information to contact the Town of Vassalboro at 207-872-2826 or email the Town Manager Aaron Miller AMiller@vassalboro.net.

OPINION: Town elder concerned about seniors in China

/0 Comments/in , , /by

COMMUNITY COMMENTARY

by Sheldon Goodine

The Rise of Senior Homeless in Maine?

We cannot let this happen in the China area. Maine folks are tough and try to go with the flow as long as possible, then it may be too late to solve the problem.

We tell our young children and adolescents, that if they see something wrong or are bullied themselves to “tell somebody”. That should apply to seniors as well. It may be very difficult to talk with a family member or maybe they don’t have a family member to talk to. “Tell Somebody”, the help you need may be as close as the town office. China Town Manager Becky Hapgood has agreed to act as a soundboard on a temporary basis and she can get you the help that is needed. Talk to her, tell her your problem and she will listen and find a solution. Some of the problems may be as follows:

Homelessness, elder abuse, food insecurity, transportation issues, medication, energy assistance, balance checkbook or paying bills, companionship and scams.

The list is long and varied. So do not carry the problem alone. “Tell Somebody”. Bottom line, you are not alone, there is help out there – start with Becky!

Good luck and God bless.

OPINIONS: No more property tax stabilization program

/0 Comments/in , , /by

COMMUNITY COMMENTARY

by Katrina Smith
State Represenative
District #62
China, Palermo, Somerville & Windsor

What can our Seniors do now?

The popular state tax assistance for seniors entitled the “Property Tax Stabilization Program”, which allowed those over the age of 65 to freeze their property taxes, has been eliminated during this past legislative session. (A vote for the budget was a vote for this program to be eliminated. Personally, I voted against the budget for this and other reasons.) Many seniors are asking, “What now?” The good news is that several State of Maine programs have been expanded that will hopefully assist our Seniors with their finances.

The first program to be expanded is the Property Tax Fairness Credit. The property tax fairness credit provides that Eligible Maine taxpayers may receive a portion of the property tax or rent paid during the tax year on the Maine individual income tax return whether they owe Maine income tax or not. If the credit exceeds the amount of your individual income tax due for the tax year, the excess amount of credit will be refunded to you. The program increased the credit from $1,500 to $2,000 for individuals 65 or older. To take advantage of this program you need to file a ME1040 and a Property Tax Fairness tax form.

The second program is the Deferred Collection of Homestead Property Taxes. The State Property Tax Deferral Program is a loan program that can cover the annual property tax bills of Maine people who are ages 65 and older or are permanently disabled and who cannot afford to pay them on their own. The loan program allows Maine’s most vulnerable community members to age in place and ensures that property taxes are still delivered to municipalities, requiring repayment of the loan once the property is sold or becomes part of an estate. The program was updated to double the income threshold to $80,000 a year and also the liquid asset threshold limit to $100,000 for individuals and $200,000 for couples. There are a few other guidelines for this program, but to see if you qualify you must file an application with your local municipal assessor between January 1 and April 1.

I hope this information is useful to our Seniors and helps them to afford to live out their golden years by relieving some of the stress involved with property taxes. I am happy to help direct anyone to other resources and can be reached at katrina.smith@legislature.maine.gov.

OPINIONS: Internet access for many may be at risk

/0 Comments/in , /by

COMMUNITY COMMENTARY

by Kim Lindlof
President, CEO Mid-Maine Chamber of Commerce

In response to our nation’s increased reliance on high-speed Internet, both the Trump and Biden Administrations have taken important steps to provide connectivity to those that need it, particularly in rural areas. An invaluable program that’s been created in recent years to enable this is the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP), which over 18 million American households are currently enrolled in. The ACP enables eligible Americans to overcome the obstacle of affordability by providing a monthly voucher which can be used on the cost of an Internet subscription. When combined with the low-income offerings made available by many of the nation’s leading providers that participate in the program, the voucher can make the cost of a subscription free for qualifying low-income families. Here in Maine, over 82,000 households are enrolled in the ACP, while another 150,000 are eligible to enroll.

Unfortunately, the ACP faces an existential threat that could eliminate Internet access for the over 18 million American households that rely on the program – its funding will run out sometime in 2024. Extending its funding to ensure that the program continues to exist should be an urgent priority for lawmakers regardless of partisanship.

A CNBC poll earlier this year found that the significant majority of Republicans and Independents support the program, and its expiration would be a blow to constituencies of both parties, as data from the Technology Policy Institute reflects that enrollment is essentially equivalent for both Republican-represented and Democratic-represented Congressional districts.

Politics aside, an end to the ACP would set us back years in our effort to overcome the affordability gap, a barrier that accounts for two-thirds of our nation’s digital divide. By not having an effective solution in place to assist Americans struggling to afford an Internet subscription due to level of income, we will more or less be fighting this fight with one arm tied behind our back.  In Maine, 39 percent of households with income less than $20,000 have no connectivity. Closing the digital divide is an effort that we must be successful in, as analyses of the issue have indicated that allowing millions of Americans to continue to be without connectivity will have grave repercussions for the American economy at large. A 2021 study from Deloitte found that a ten percentage-point increase in broadband penetration in 2016 would have created more than 806,000 additional jobs in 2019.

The persistence of the digital divide will continue to mean untapped prosperity for the American economy, and it’s not hard to understand why. Seemingly every industry stands to benefit by having access to high-speed Internet and all of the essential resources that come with it. This means not only capabilities for remote working, but also access to information, so those working in sectors that are more hands-on and less computer-intensive can still utilize the Internet to yield better results. An example of this could be a farmer in Clinton that relies on online resources for market prices, weather forecasts, farming techniques, and agricultural research, or a small business owner in Waterville that utilizes online platforms to advertise its product and grow its brand.

Overall, I am hopeful that federal policymakers understand that combatting affordability barriers is an integral part of getting Americans online, but I also hope that this understanding will translate into tangible action that specifically acknowledges the need to prolong the Affordable Connectivity Program. With the program set to expire next year, we need to find a funding solution in the near future that keeps this critical program intact.