LETTERS: CMP and the ospreys

To the editor:

My friend Marty and myself are convinced that CMP – Central Maine Power, is responsible for placement of the osprey nests on the power line poles. Have you ever noticed that these nests are typically adjacent to the road? You can look through the clear cut area and see multiple poles, but the nests are on the pole immediately next to the road. There are numerous examples of this on Turner Ridge Rd., the 105, and along Highway 95. south before Fairfield. With all these options … Why would an osprey build a nest on the exact pole next to the road ?

You may say that it’s close to the road to allow these birds to eat road kill. To my knowledge osprey catch live fish and it’s typically crows or vultures that eat road kill. My wife Margaret talked to the CMP crew that was installing new power poles about this question and they just had a good laugh at our expense. I have Googled the question and there are some examples of CMP intervention to relocate Osprey nests that could cause harm to the birds or cause power outages. It shows some type of human intervention but it still does not answer the question about CMP placement of nests adjacent to roads.

The purpose of this letter to the editor is to solicit feedback on whether it’s true or false that CMP is responsible for the placement of these osprey nests.

Okay, I know I’m retired and I have extra time on my hands to ponder these types of questions. So please if you have any facts on this subject please write your own letter to the editor to The Town Line with the information. Please help us in this debate!

Gary Mazoki
Palermo

LETTERS: Disagrees with article

To the editor:

I was very disappointed in the uncredited May 22 article entitled “Local students go to state house to support girls’ sports and spaces.” Not only did it display a shocking amount of bias, but it was also poorly researched and nonfactual. It made the claim that, “most Mainers recognize these bills are commonsense policy that needs to be passed.” It fact, the vast majority of individuals who showed up to testify, including many female student athletes, were testifying against these anti-trans bills.

I won’t include numbers here for every bill (testimony available to all at https://legislature.maine.gov/Calendar on May 8), but just one of the bills, LD 1337, had 92 testifying for it and 477 testifying against, with two neutral testimonies. That is more than five times as many individuals who do not believe that these bills should be passed. I am not writing here to make an argument on the bills myself, but I strongly encourage readers to look at the words of their fellow Mainers themselves and check out some of the testimonies. The bills in question are LD 233, LD 868, LD 1002, LD 1134, LD 1704, LD 1337, LD 1432, and LD 380.

I have lived in East Vassalboro since I was six and have been an active member of the community, including stage managing a play at the local Grange with proceeds to benefit The Town Line. It is incredibly disheartening to me to see this paper, which should represent our community, showing blatant prejudice against myself and many other queer members of the community.

Kala Freytag Wistar,
East Vassalboro

LETTERS: Big not so pretty bill

To the editor:

The way to convey to you how utterly awful the so-called “one big beautiful bill” passed by the House [recently] actually would be to give you this short ten-question exam. (Answers are in parenthesis but first try to answer without looking at them.)

1. Does the House’s “one big beautiful bill” cut Medicare? (Answer: Yes, by an estimated $500 billion.)
2. Because the bill cuts Medicaid, how many Americans are expected to lose Medicaid coverage? (At least 8.6 million.)
3. Will the tax cut in the bill benefit the rich or the poor or everyone? (Overwhelmingly, the rich.)
4. How much will the top 0.1 percent of earners stand to gain from it? (Nearly $390,000 per year).
5. If you figure in the benefit cuts and the tax cuts, will Americans making between about $17,000 and $51,000 gain or lose? (They’ll lose about $700 a year).
6. How about Americans with incomes less than $17,000? (They’ll lose more than $1,000 per year on average).
7. How much will the bill add to the federal debt? ($3.8 trillion over 10 years.)
8. Who will pay the interest on this extra debt? (All of us, in both our tax payments and higher interest rates for mortgages, car loans, and all other longer-term borrowing.)
9. Who collects this interest? (People who lend to the U.S. government, 70 percent of whom are American and most of whom are
wealthy.)
10. Bonus question: Is the $400 million airplane from Qatar a gift to the United States for every future president to use, or a gift to Trump for his own personal use? (It’s a personal gift because he’ll get to use it after he leaves the presidency.)

Most Americans are strongly opposed to all of these.

Paige Schadt
Belgrade

LETTERS: Beware of CryptoCurrency ATM

To the editor:

It is very likely that most Mainers, even if they have never used a CryptoCurrency ATM, have seen them in neighborhood grocery stores, convenience stores or liquor stores. They are easy to spot as they are designed to imitate a regular ATM. However, it is important to know that these machines are neither FDIC insured nor regulated like bank industry ATMs. Although these machines can be used for legitimate commerce, unfortunately the Cryptocurrency ATMs provide an easy conduit for criminal use.

According to the FTC, nationwide fraud losses through Crypto ATMs jumped nearly tenfold from 2020 to 2023 and surpassed $65 million in the first half of last year. This is why AARP Maine is in favor of the Crypto ATM Scam Prevention Bill, LD 1339, a measure that will help prevent Crypto ATM scams and protect older Mainers from criminals who want to steal their life savings.

Because Crypto ATMS are still relatively new and largely unregulated compared to traditional financial institutions and money service businesses, they lack sufficient consumer fraud protections. As a result, criminals use Crypto ATMs to steal tens of thousands from Mainers each year through their fraudulent schemes.

We ask Mainers to join our efforts to pass LD 1339 by urging their own legislators to support this bill and stop Cryptocurrency ATM scams. With the high dollar amounts being stolen via these machines from our neighbors, friends and loved ones, Maine cannot afford to wait. This bill must be passed now.

Paul Armstrong
AARP Maine Lead Advocacy Volunteer
Palermo

LETTERS: Speaking for the Unheard

To the editor:

Sparked by a letter to the editor from an AARP volunteer in Maine, highlights how the issue of social isolation among adults 50 and older, 28 percent of seniors living alone totaling more than 14.7 million people (5 million men and 9.7 million women) remains a global concern.

This illustration comes at a perfect time, leading us into June, which is Elder Abuse Awareness Month. Social isolation is a key factor contributing to elder abuse, a problem that is distressingly common and remains unseen. We know individuals affected by this personal problem and may one day be facing it ourselves.

Living through the pandemic’s aftermath recall how widespread social isolation felt and how this mirrors the daily reality of many elders, particularly those lacking close family connections, who also experienced profound feelings of disconnection. Whether a person’s social circle is large or small, being cut off from others has significant consequences. There is a growing body of research confirming that social connections are vital for an individual’s overall mental and physical health.

Let us advocate for our elder population and use Maine’s proactive approach of providing supported resources to aid them directly as an example. I implore you, the readers, to show compassion by actively reaching out to someone who may need to hear a friendly voice, volunteering at a local senior living facility, visiting neighbors or loved ones that are craving your attention. The lives of elders matter too and should matter to you.

Angelica Caballero,
Los Banos

LETTERS: Get involved with civic engagement

To the editor:

After attending a screening of “Join or Die” last year, a documentary about the decline of civic engagement across the United States, I felt inspired to get involved in Skowhegan. That led me to join the Skowhegan Heritage Council, a town commission dedicated to preserving our history and strengthening collaboration among local organizations.

In many ways, the Heritage Council is about building bridges: between generations, between organizations, and between our past and our future. It’s a small but essential part of our civic infrastructure. Like all infrastructure, it depends on people to keep it strong. In a time when federal funding is shrinking and competition for grants is growing, Skowhegan needs structures like this. Not only to protect what we value, but to coordinate efforts effectively and make the most of our shared resources.

Right now, the Heritage Council is seeking new members to help sustain its work and safeguard Skowhegan’s heritage for the future. You don’t need to be an expert, just someone who cares about Skowhegan and wants to contribute. If you’re interested in joining, nomination applications can be submitted to the Town Manager’s Office at the Skowhegan Municipal Building.

And if you are located elsewhere, I encourage you to get involved where you are. Whether it’s a committee, a library, or a local volunteer group, showing up is how we shape and strengthen the places we call home.

Celeste Banda
Skowhegan

LETTERS: Electricity rates continue to be a burden on Mainers

To the editor:

Rising electricity rates continue to be a burden on Mainers which is why I am writing to express concern regarding LD 186, “An Act to Clarify the Public Utilities Commission’s (PUC) Authority to Establish Time of Use Pricing for Standard Offer Service.” This bill could have a significant impact on older Mainers’ electric bills.

The bill would allow the PUC to impose time of use (TOU) rates for Standard Offer Service (the supply of electricity for nearly all Maine electric customers). TOU involves charging different rates for electricity usage during peak and off-peak hours. This is something the Commission has publicly stated they wish to do, even though a full analysis has yet to be completed in Maine.

Shifting to TOU would disproportionately impact retirees, family caregivers, and those who work from home. Individuals who are home during peak hours could find it difficult to shift their energy usage to off-peak times. Also, many Mainers have switched to heat pumps or are thinking about making the switch. TOU pricing would make home heating even more expensive since these devices are 100 percent electric.

As part of a 2022 proceeding, the PUC ordered Central Maine Power to evaluate various rate design offerings (including TOU) and submit recommendations by December 2025. We question why the PUC is pushing a move towards TOU before this analysis and its subsequent recommendations have been completed.

I was made aware of this pending legislation through my volunteer work with AARP Maine. I urge all readers to join AARP in opposing LD 186. Please contact your legislators and encourage them to vote against this bill. It is crucial that we protect our older residents from policies that could harm their financial stability and well-being.

John White
Lead Utilities Advocacy Volunteer, AARP Maine
Greene, Maine

LETTERS: Somerville adrift

To the editor:

The letter (The Town Line, January 2, 2025) portraying Somerville as a ship cast into chaos after a “mutiny” overlooks some critical truths. There was no mutiny. There was a vote – and the so-called “captain” wasn’t tossed overboard; he was removed by the will of the people. He didn’t even choose to stand on the ballot. Instead, he opted for a last-minute, clandestine write-in campaign – one seemingly aimed less at public service and more at undermining a fellow Somerville resident who had the integrity to run openly and transparently.

Let’s not rewrite history.

The chaos we now face wasn’t born in recent months but was the product of years of miscommunication, deflection, and carefully cultivated confusion. Under the former officeholder’s watch, Somerville was not led – it was slowly destabilized, and left in a financially precarious position that the current administration is now working diligently to correct.

To romanticize his time in office as a noble command at sea is misleading. If anything, the town’s former “captain” was more of a ship’s biscuit – dry, hard, and ultimately a liability in any true storm.

As residents look toward future leadership, we should not confuse experience with effectiveness, nor deception with strategy. What Somerville needs now is not a return to quiet dysfunction, but a commitment to honest, capable governance.

Michael Cox
Somerville Resident

LETTERS: Funding for climate change research is needed

To the editor:

As a scientist, I am deeply alarmed by the news that NOAA was asked to supply a list of active climate-related grant funding. This request raises alarms about potential cuts to critical climate research and mitigation efforts. There is no meaningful scientific debate about the reality of climate change, and over 70 percent of adults believe climate change will harm future generations. In the wake of recent natural disasters, climate change risks are clear, and defunding these grants could have severe consequences for human health and well-being.

Climate-related research funded by federal agencies supports climate monitoring, weather forecasting, and cutting-edge science. This research highlights vulnerable resources where the need for intervention is highest and is critical to mounting an effective response to climate change and understanding the potential risks.

Here in Maine, we have recently seen an increase in sea level, leading to coastal flooding and other natural disasters. But other climate-change risks are more subtle. My own master’s research has highlighted how anthropogenic climate change is altering the fall color timing and intensity in the northeast, which could have substantial impacts on Maine’s late fall tourism. Without the data to drive informed policy and decision-making, we leave our coasts and communities vulnerable to climate, economic, and public health disasters, ultimately weakening our national security.

I urge policymakers, scientists, and the public to push for continued federal funding of climate research and, in doing so, reaffirm that scientific research is essential for safeguarding our communities from climate change.

Alexis Garretson
Hampden

LETTERS: Sadly, estranged from my daughter

To the editor:

Regarding my daughter’s rebuttal letter to The Town Line, it should be noted that the only references to dollars was what I paid a man to share my driving back to Maine. I would remind her I allowed her to write her own checks from our joint account, in her own words, “I do really appreciate your helping me out!”

I saw a lawyer who said I did nothing wrong: 1) Telling senior citizens not to make the mistake I did. 2) no malice, I wrote the truth. 3) it was not meant for her eyes to see and why I wrote to The Town Line, 2,000 miles away from Florida. My lawyer asked me and I ask you editor, et al, how the heck did she get to even know about The Town Line, or access it? Oh well, I am now estranged from my daughter. Sad as it has to be.

Frank Slason
Augusta